Clarificación de teorías de lectura en segunda lengua a través del análisis de estudios empíricos

Referencias bibliográficas

• Afflerbach, P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge and text genre on readers’ prediction strategies. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 22(2), 131-148.
• Al-Shumaimeri, Y. (2005). Gender Differences in Reading Comprehension Performance in Relation to Content Familiarity of Gender-Neutral Texts. Paper presented at the second international conference: Language, culture and literature, Minia University, Egypt
• Al-Shumaimeri, Y. (2006). The effects of content familiarity and language ability on reading comprehension performance of low-and high-ability Saudi tertiary students studying English as a foreign language. Educational Sciences & Islamic Studies, 18(2), 1-19.
• Anderson, R.C., & Pearson, P.D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of reading comprehension. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). New York: Longman.
• Anderson, R.C., & Pichert, J.W. (1978). Recall of previous unrecallable information following a shifting perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 1-12.
• Bacon, S.M. (1992). The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in foreign language listening. Modern Language Journal, 76, 161-178.
• Bacon, S. M., & Finnemann, M. D. (1992). Sex differences in self-reported beliefs about foreign language learning and authentic oral and written input. Language Learning, 42, 471-495.
• Bartlett, F. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Beaugrande, R. de (1980). Text, discourse and process. Toward a multidisciplinary science of texts. London: Longman.
• Bernhardt, E.B. (2003). Challenges to reading research from a multilingual world. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 112-117.
• Bernhardt, E.B. (2005). Progress and procrastination in second language reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 133-155.
• Carrell, P.L. (1983). Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Language Learning, 33, 183-207.
• Carrell, P.L. (1991), Second language reading: Reading ability or language proficiency? Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 159-179.
• Carrell, P.L., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. (1988). Interactive approaches to second language reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Chen, Q. (1995). Comprehension of science texts : effects of domain-specific knowledge and language proficiency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
• Clapham, C. (1996). The development of IELTS: A study of the effect of background knowledge on reading comprehension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Clarke, M. (1979). Reading in Spanish and English : evidence form adult ESL students. Language Learning, 29, 121-150.
• Cziko, G.A. (1978). Differences in firstand second-language reading : the use of syntactic, semantic and discourse constraints. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 473-489.
• Cziko, G.A. (1980). Language competence and reading strategies : a comparison of first and second language oral reading errors. Language Learning, 30, 101-114.
• Daneman, M. (1996). Individual differnces in reading skills. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal and P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 512- 538). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaumn.
• Donin, J., Graves, B., & Goyette, E. (2004). Second language text comprehension : processing within a multilayered system. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(1), 53-76.
• Ehrman, M.E., & Oxford, R.L. (1989). Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adults’ language learning strategies. Modern Language Journal, 73(1), 1-13.
• Goodman, K.S. (1996). On reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• Hammadou, J. (1991). Interrelationships among prior knowledge, inference, and language proficiency in foreign language reading. Modern Language Journal, 75, 27-38.
• Horiba, Y. (1996). Comprehension processes in L2 reading : language, competence, textual coherence, and inferences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 403-432.
• Horiba, Y. (2000). Reader control in reading : effects of language competence, text type, and task. Discourse processes, 29, 223-267.
• Hudson, T. (1982). The effects of induced schemata in L2 reading : non-decoding factors in L2 reading performance. Language Learning, 32, 1-32.
• Johnson, P. (1981). Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background of a text. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 169-181.
• Johnson, P. (1982). Effects on reading comprehension of building background knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 4, 503-517.
• Keshavarz, M., & Ashtarian, S. (2008). The relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ gender and reading comprehension of three different types of text. IJAL, 11(1), 97-113.
• Keshavarz, M.H., Reza, M., & Ahmadi, H. (2007). Content schemata, linguistic simplification, and EFL readers’ comprehension and recall. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19(1), 19-33.
• Koh, M.Y. (1984). The role of prior knowledge in the interpretation of texts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of English for speakers of other languages, University of London.
• Lee, J.F. (1997). Non-native reading research and theory. In K. Bardovi-Harlig and B. Hartford (Eds.), Beyond methods: Components of second language teacher education (pp. 152- 171). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Mohammed, M.A.H., & Swales, J.M. (1984). Factors affecting the successful reading of technical instructions. Reading in a Foreign Language, 2(2), 206-217.
• Nassaji, H. (2002). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 52(2), 439-481.
• Nassaji, H. (2003). Higher-level and lower-level text processing skills in advanced ESL reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 261-276.
• Nuttall, C. (1998). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann.
• Oxford, R.L. (1994). Language learning strategies: An update. ERIC Digest. (Report No. EDO-FL-95-02). ERIC Clearinghouse on Language and Linguistics: Washington, D.C. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED376707).
• Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at gender and strategy use in L2 reading. Language Learning, 53(4), 649-702.
• Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata and processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(4), 273-295.
• Shokouhi, H., and Parvaresh, N. (2010). Post-adjunct reading comprehension questions and meaning construction: a case of gender study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(1), 8-19.
• Smith, F. (1994). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read (5th ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Stanovich, K.E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading. Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.
• Steffensen, M.S., Joag-dev, C., and Anderson, R.C. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 10-29.
• Taillefer, G. (1996). L2 reading ability: Further insights into the short-circuit hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 80, 461-477.
• Usó-Juan, E. (2006). The compensatory nature of discipline-related knowledge and English language proficiency in reading English for academic purposes. The Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 210-227.