Opposite effects of ethanol on taste and place conditioning in rats

  1. López Ramírez, Matías 1
  2. Cantora, Raúl 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revue:
Revista iberoamericana de psicología y salud

ISSN: 2171-2069

Année de publication: 2010

Volumen: 1

Número: 2

Pages: 207-221

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista iberoamericana de psicología y salud

Résumé

En este estudio con ratas se examinaron las propiedades motivacionales del alcohol con los procedimientos conductuales de aversión condicionada al sabor y de preferencia de lugar. El Experimento 1 se realizó con el procedimiento de aversión al sabor. Las ratas recibieron durante el condicionamiento, en días alternos, emparejamientos de una solución gustativa con una inyección de etanol (1.0 g/kg) y de un sabor diferente con una inyección de salino. En una prueba posterior los animales consumieron menos la solución gustativa asociada con el alcohol durante el condicionamiento. En el Experimento 2 se empleó el procedimiento de preferencia condicionada de lugar. Las ratas eran inyectadas con alcohol o con salino antes de introducirlas durante 30 minutos en uno de los lados de una cámara de condicionamiento con dos compartimentos. En la prueba se medía el tiempo que pasaban los animales en cada una de los lados de la cámara de condicionamiento. Los sujetos inyectados con alcohol mostraron una preferencia por el lado del aparato en el que habían experimentado los efectos fisiológicos del alcohol. Los resultados indican que la dosis de alcohol administrada en este estudio puede tener tanto efectos motivacionales positivos como negativos en el organismo.

Références bibliographiques

  • Bardo, M. T., & Bevins, R. A. (2000). Conditioned place preference: What does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward? Psychopharmacology, 153, 31- 43.
  • Bienkowski, P., Kuca, P., & Kostowski, W. (1995). Conditioned place preference after prolonged preexposure to ethanol. Polish Journal of Pharmacology, 47, 185- 187.
  • Bienkowski, P., Kuca, P., Piasecki, J., & Kostowski, W. (1996). Low dose of ethanol induces conditioned place preference in rats after repeated exposures to ethanol or saline injections. Alcohol & Alcoholism, 31, 547-553.
  • Bormann, N. M., & Cunningham, C. L. (1998). Ethanol.-induced conditioned place aversion in rats: Effect of interstimulus interval. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behaviour, 59, 427-432.
  • Bozarth, M. A. (1990). Evidence for the rewarding effects of ethanol using the conditioned place preference method. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behaviour, 35, 485-487.
  • Broadbent, J., Muccino, K .J., & Cunningham, C. L. (2002). Ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion in 15 inbred mouse strains. Behavioural Neuroscience, 116, 138-148.
  • Cabib, S., Puglisi-Allegra, S.,Genua, C., Simon, H., Le Moal, M., & Piazza, P. V. (1996). Dose-dependent aversive and rewarding effects of amphetamine as revealed by a new place conditioning apparatus. Psychopharmacology, 125, 92- 96.
  • Ciccocioppo, R., Panocka, I., Froldi, R., Quitadamo, E., & Massi, M. (1999). Ethanolinduces conditioned place preference in genetically selected alcohol-preferring rats. Psyhopharmacology, 141, 235-241.
  • Cunningham, C. L. (1981). Spatial aversion conditioning with ethanol. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behaviour, 14, 263-264.
  • Cunningham, C. L., Fidler, T. L., & Hill, K.G. (2000). Animal models of alcohol´s motivational effects. Alcohol Research Health, 24, 85-92.
  • Cunningham, C. L., & Gremel, C. M. (2006). Proximal ethanol pretreatment interferes with acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behaviour, 85, 612-619.
  • Cunningham, C. L., & Henderson, C. M. (2000). Ethanol-induced conditioned place aversion in mice. Behavioural Pharmacology, 11, 591-602.
  • Cunningham, C. L., Niehus, J. H., & Noble, D. (1993). Species difference in sensitivity to ethanol´s hedonic effects. Alcohol, 10, 97-102.
  • Cunningham, C. L., Okorn, D. M., & Howard, C. E. (1997). Interstimulus interval determines whether ethanol produces conditioned place preference or aversion in mice. Animal Learning and Behaviour, 25, 31-42.
  • Cunningham, C. L., Smith, R., & McMullin, C. (2003). Competition between ethanolinduced reward and aversion in place conditioning. Learning and Behaviour, 31, 273-280.
  • Cunningham, C. L., Tull, L. E., Rindal, K. E., & Meyer, P. J. (2002). Distal and proximal preexposure to ethanol in the place conditioning task: Tolerance to aversive effect, sensitization to activating effect, but no change in rewarding effect. Psyhopharmacology, 160, 414-424.
  • Fidler, T. L., Bakner, L., & Cunningham, C. L. (2004). Conditioned place aversion induced by intragastric administration of ethanol in rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behaviour, 77, 731-743.
  • Green, A. S., & Grahame, N. J. (2008). Ethanol drinking in rodents: Is free-choice drinking related to the reinforcing effects of ethanol? Alcohol, 42, 1-11.
  • Hunt,T., & Amit, Z. (1987). Conditioned taste aversion induced by self-administered drugs: Paradoxal revisited. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews, 11, 107- 130.
  • Kulkosky, P. J., Sickel, J. L., & Riley, A. L. (1980). Total avoidance of saccharion consumption by rats after repeatedly paired injections of ethanol or LiCl. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behaviour, 13, 77-8
  • Lancelloti, D., Bayer, B. M., Glowa, J. R., Houghtling, R. A., & Riley, A. L. (2001). Morphine-induced conditioned taste aversion in the LEW/N and F344/N rat strains. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behaviour, 68, 603-610.
  • Lett, B. T. (1989). Repeated exposures intensify rather than diminish the rewarding effects of amphetamine, morphine, and cocaine. Psychopharmacology, 98, 357- 362.
  • Orsini, C., Bonito-Oliva, A., Conversi, D., & Cabib, S. (2005). Susceptibility to conditioned place preference induced by addictive drugs in mice of the C57BL/6 and DBA/2 inbred strains. Psyhopharmacology, 181, 327-336.
  • Pautassi, R. M., Nizhnikov, M. E., & Spear, N. E. (2009). Assessing appetitive, aversive, and negative ethanol-mediated reinforcement through an immature rat model. Neuroscience and Biobehavoral Reviews, 33, 953-974.
  • Reicher, M. A., & Holman, E. W. (1977). Location preference and flavour aversion reinforced by amphetamine in rats. Animal Learning and Behaviour, 5, 343-346.
  • Riley, A. L., & Simpson, G. R. (2001). The attenuating effects of drug preexposure on taste aversion conditioning: Generality, experimental parameters, underlying mechanisms and implications for drug use and abuse. In R. R. Mowrer & Klein, S. B. (Eds.), Contemporary learning theory (pp. 505-559). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Reicher, M. A., & Holman, E. W. (1977). Location preference and flavour aversion reinforced by amphetamine in rats. Animal Learning and Behaviour, 5, 343-346.
  • Reid, L. D., Hunter, G. A., Beaman, C. M., & Hubbell, C. L. (1985). Toward understanding ethanol´s capacity to be reinforcing: A conditioned place preference following injections of ethanol. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behaviour, 22, 483-487.
  • Risinger, F. O., & Cunningham, C. L. (1998). Ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion in BXD recombinant inbred mice. Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research, 22, 1234-1244.
  • Risinger, F. O., Cunningham, C .L., Bevins, R. A., & Holloway, F.A. (2002). Place conditioning: What does it add to our understanding of ethanol reward? Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research, 26, 1444-1452.
  • Roma, P. G., Flint, W. W., Higley, J. D., & Riley, A. L. (2006). Assessment of the aversive and rewarding effects of alcohol in Fischer and Lewis rats. Psyhopharmacology, 189, 187-199.
  • Sanchis-Segura, C., & Spanagel, R. (2006). Behavioural assessment of drug reinforcement and addictive features in rodents: An overview. Addiction Biology, 11, 2-38.
  • Sherman, J. E., Pickman, C., Rice, A., Liebeskind, J. C., & Holman, E. W. (1980). Rewarding and aversive effects of morphine: Temporal and phramacological properties. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behaviour, 13, 501-505.
  • Sherman, J. E., Roberts, T., Roskam, S. E., & Holman, E. W. (1980). Temporal properties of the rewarding and aversive effects of amphetamine in rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behaviour, 13, 597-599.
  • Simpson, G. R., & Riley, A. L. (2005). Morphine preexposure facilitates morphine place preference and attenuates morphine taste aversion. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behaviour, 80, 471-479.
  • Stewart, R. B., & Grupp, L.A. (1986). Conditioned place aversion mediated by orally self-administered ethanol in the rat. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behaviour, 24, 1369-1375.
  • Tzschentke, T.M. (1998). Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference paradigm: A comprehensive review of drug effects, recent progress and new issues. Progress in Neurobiology, 56, 613-672.
  • Tzschentke, T. M. (2007). Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm: Update of the last decade. Addiction Biology, 12, 227-462.
  • Van der Kooy, D., O´Shaughnessy, M., Mucha, R F., & Kalant, H. (1983). Motivational properties of ethanol in naive rats as studied by place conditioning. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behaviour, 19, 441-445.
La source de données: Dialnet