Analysis of the Relationship between Teaching Discourse Makers to ESP Learners and their Reading Comprehension Performance

Referencias bibliográficas

• Anscombre, J. Cl. and O. Ducrot (1983). L'argumentation dans la Langue. Brussels: Madarga.
• Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell. Blakemore. D. (1988). So as a constraint on relevance. In R. Kempson, ed.,
• Mental representation: The Interface between Language and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 183-195.
• Blakemore, D. (1989a). Denial and contrast: A relevance theoretic analysis of but. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 28-51.
• Blakemore, D. (1989b). Linguistic form and pragmatic interpretation: the explicit and the implicit. In Leo Hickey, ed., The Pragmatics of Style. London: Routledge.
• Blakemore, D. (1992). Understanding Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Blakemore, D. (1993). The relevance of reformulation. Language and Literature 2(2): 101-220.
• Blakemore, D. (1996). Are apposition markers discourse markers?. Journal of Linguistics 32: 325-347.
• Blass, R. (1990). Relevance Relations in Discourse: A Study with Special Reference to Sissala. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ducrot, O. (1972). Dire et ne pas Dire. Paris: Hermann.
• Ducrot, O. (1973). La Preuve et le Dire. Paris: Mame.
• Ducrot, O. (1984). Le Dire et le Dit. Paris: Minuit.
• Fraser, B. (1990). An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14 : 383-395.
• Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers?. Journal of Pragmatics, 31: 931-952.
• Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan, eds.,
• Syntax and Semantics, Volume 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
• Halliday, M. A. K. and R. Hasan (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
• Hansen, M. B. M. (1997). Alors and donc in spoken French: A reanalysis. Journal of Pragmatics 28: 153-187.
• Hovy, F. and F. Maier (1994). Parsimonious or Profligate: How Many and Which Discourse Structure Relations?
• Knott, A. and R. Dale (1994). Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 18: 35-62.
• Mann, W. and S. Thompson (1986). Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse Processes 9: 57-90.
• Sanders, T., Spooren, W. and L. Noordman (1993. Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation. Cognitive Linguistics 4(2): 93-133.
• Sinclair, J. (1981). Planes of discourse. The Twofold Voice. Essays in Honour of K.Mohan.
• Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. Second Edition 1995.
• Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1995). Postface. In D. Sperber and D. Wilson. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Second Edition. Oxford: Blackwell, 255-279.
• Tadros, A. (1985). Prediction in Text. Birmingham: English Language Research. University of Birmingham.
• Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Learning Purpose and Language Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Wilson, D. and D. Sperber (1993). Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90:1-25.