Utilidad de los criterios compuestos y múltiples mediante eficacia discriminativa en seleccion de personal

  1. García Izquierdo, Mariano
  2. García Izquierdo, Antonio León 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2006

Volumen: 18

Número: 2

Páginas: 243-248

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Blasco, R. y Prieto, J.M. (1993). Validité et utilité de l’evauation de la personalité en gestion du personnel. Revue Européen de Psychologie Appliquée, 43 (3), 231-239.
  • Blum, M. y Naylor, J.C. (1968/1976). Psicología industrial. Sus fundamentos teóricos y sociales. México: Trillas.
  • Borman, W.C. y Motowidlo, S.J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. En N. Schmitt y W.C. Borman (eds.): Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Brogden, H.E. y Taylor, E.K. (1950). The dollar-criterion applying the cost accounting concept to criterion construction. Personnel Psychology, 3, 133-153.
  • Calles, A. (1975). B-53 Test de inteligencia no verbal. En J. García Yagüe, A. Cordero y A. Murga: Tests empleados en España. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Psicología Aplicada y Orientación Profesional.
  • Campbell, J.P., Dunnette, M.D., Lawler, E.E. y Weick, K.E. (1970). Managerial behavior, performance and effectiveness. Nueva York. McGraw- Hill.
  • Campbell, J.P. (1990). Modelling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. En M.D. Dunnette y L.M. Hough (eds.): Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 687-732). Palo Alto: Jossey Bass.
  • Campbell, J.P., Blake, M. y Oswald, F. (1996). The substantive nature of job performance variability. En K.R. Murphy (ed.): Individual differences and behavior in organizations (pp. 258- 299). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • Carless, S.A. y Robertson-Thompson, G.P. (2001). Self-ratings in training programs: an examination of level of performance and the effect of feedback. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9 (3), 217-225.
  • Carretta, T.R. y Ree, M.J. (2000). General and specific cognitive and psychomotor abilities in personnel selection: the prediction of training and job performance. IJSA, 8 (4), 227-236.
  • Drenth, P. y Algera, J. (1988). Personnel selection. En P. Warr (ed.): Psychology at work (pp. 113-400). Penguin. Londres.
  • Dunnette, M.D. (1963). A note on the criterion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 251-254.
  • Escudero, J.T., Balagué, G. y García-Mas, A. (2002). Comportamientos que influyen en el rendimiento deportivo de jugadores de baloncesto desde el punto de vista de los entrenadores. Psicothema, 14 (1), 34-38.
  • García, M.V., Alvarado, J. y Jiménez, A. (2000). La predicción del rendimiento académico: regresión lineal versus regresión logística. Psicothema, 12 (2), 248-252.
  • García, M.A., Barbero, M.I., Ávila, I. y García, M.C. (2003). La motivación laboral de los jóvenes en su primer empleo. Psicothema, 15 (1), 109-113.
  • García-Izquierdo, A.L. (2001). Validación orientada al criterio de procedimientos de selección de personal de oficio para el pronóstico del rendimiento laboral y formativo en el sector de la construcción. Universidad de Murcia. Tesis doctoral no publicada.
  • García-Izquierdo, A.L. (2002). Selección, discriminación e igualdad de oportunidades en el acceso al empleo. Universidad de Oviedo. Tesina de licenciatura no publicada.
  • García-Izquierdo, A.L. y García-Izquierdo, M. (2002). Pronóstico de la inserción laboral en el sector de la construcción. Psicothema, 14 (4), 726-732.
  • Ghiselli, E.E. (1956). Dimensional problems of criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 40, 1-4.
  • Guion, R.M. (1961). Criterion measurement and personnel judgments. Personnel Psychology, 14, 141-149.
  • Guion, R.M. (1979). Principles of work sample testing: III. Construction and evaluation of work sample tests. TR- 79- A10. Alexandria: United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
  • Guion, R.M. (1997). Criterion measures and the criterion dilemma. En N. Anderson y P. Herriot (eds.): International Handbook of Selection and Assessment (pp. 267-286). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. y Black, W.C. (1999). Análisis multivariante. Madrid: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hersey, P. y Blanchard, K. (1982). Management of organizational behavior: utilizing human resources. Nueva Jersey, Englewood Cliff: Prentice Hall.
  • Hunter, J.E. y Schmidt, F.L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
  • Ilgen, D.R. y Pulakos, E.D. (1999). The changing nature of performance. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • Katz, D. y Kahn, R.L (1966/1978). Psicología social de las organizaciones. México: Trillas.
  • Latham, G.P. (1984). The appraisal system as a strategic control. En C.J. Fombrun y N.M. Tichy (eds.): Strategic human resource management (pp. 87-100). Nueva York: Wiley.
  • Latham, G.P. (1986). Job performance and appraisal. En C.L. Cooper e I.T. Robertson (eds.): International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 117-155). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Muchinsky, M.P (1994). Psicología aplicada al trabajo. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer.
  • Murphy, K.R. (1997). Meta- analysis and validity generalization. En N. Anderson y P. Herriot (eds.): International Handbook of Selection and Assessment (pp. 323- 342). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Murphy, K.R. y Cleveland, J.N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: social, organizational and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Nagle, B.F. (1953). Criterion development. Personnel Psychology, 6, 271- 288.
  • Nijenhuis, J.T. y Van Der Flier, H. (2000). Differential prediction of inmigrant versus majority group training performance using cognitive ability and personality measures. IJSA, 8 (2), 54-60.
  • Quijano, S.D. (1993). La Psicología social en las organizaciones: fundamentos. Barcelona: PPU.
  • Quiñones, M., Ford, J.K. y Teachout, M.S. (1995). The relationship between work experience and job performance: a conceptual and metaanalyitic review. Personnel Psychology, 48, 887- 910.
  • Sackett, P. (1998). Performance assessment in educational and professional certifications: lessons for personnel selection? En M.D. Hakel (ed.): Beyond Multiple Choice (pp. 113-130). Mahwah: LEA.
  • Salgado, J.F. (1998). Big five personality dimensions and job performance in army and civil occupations: a european perspective. Human Performance, 11 (2/3), 271-288.
  • Salgado, J.F. (2003a). International validity generalization of GMA and cognitive abilities: a european community meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 56, 573-605.
  • Salgado, J.F. (2003b). Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 323-346.
  • Saville, P., Holdsworth, R., Nyfield, G., Cramp, L. y Mabey, W. (1985). Occupational Personality Questionnaire: Manual. Esher- Surrey: SHL. Ltd.
  • Schmidt, F.L. y Kaplan, L.B. (1971). Composite vs multiple criteria: a review and resolution of the controversy. Personnel Psychology, 24, 419-434.
  • Schmidt, F.L. y Hunter, J.E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: practical and theoretical implications of 85 of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124 (2), 262-274.
  • Schmitt, N. y Chan, D. (1998). Personnel selection. A theoretical approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Schmitt, N., Gooding, R.Z., Noe, R.D. y Kirsch, M. (1984). Meta-analysis of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 37, 407-422.
  • Schuler, H., Farr, J.L. y Smith, M. (1993). The individual and organizational sides of personnel selection and assessment. En H. Schuler, J.L. Farr y M. Smith. (eds.): Personnel Selection and Placement (pp. 1-9). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Sonnentag, S. (2000). Expertise at work: experience and excellent performance. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 15, 223- 264.
  • Steele-Johnson, D., Osburn, H.G. y Pieper, K.F. (2000). A review and extension of current models of dynamic criteria. IJSA, 8 (3), 110-136.
  • Tett, R., Jackson, D. y Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: a meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
  • Tziner, A., Murphy, K.R. y Cleveland, J.N. (2001). Relationships between attitudes toward organizations and performance appraisal systems and rating behavior. IJSA, 9 (3), 226-239.
  • Toops, H.A. (1944). The criterion. Educational and Psychology Measurement, 4, 271-297.
  • Viswesvaran, C. y Ones, D.S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. IJSA, 8 (4), 216-226.
  • Wilson, R.L. y Hardgrave, B.C. (1995). Predicting graduate student success in an MBA program: regression versus classification. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 186-195.
  • Wiggins, J.S. (1973). Personality and prediction. Reading, Massachusets: Addison-Wesley.