Indices de frecuencia y vecindad para palabras de cinco letras

Referencias bibliográficas

• 1. Alameda, J.R. (1996). Incidencia de la vecindad léxica ortográfica en el reconocimiento visual de palabras. Tesis Doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Oviedo
• 2. Alameda, J.R. y Cuetos, F. (1995). Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano. Oviedo: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.
• 3. Alameda, J.R. y Cuetos (1996). Índices de frecuencia y vecindad ortográfica para un corpus de palabras de cuatro letras. Rema 1(1), 10-29 (URL:Http//www3.uniovi.es/~Psi/ REMA).
• 4. Alameda, J.R. y Cuetos (1997). Frecuencia y vecindad ortográfica: factores independientes o relacionados. Psicológica 18(1), 10-29.
• 5. Alameda, J.R. y Cuetos (2000). Incidencia de la vecindad ortográfica en el reconocimiento de palabras. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 53(1), 85-107.
• 6. Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search. Journalof Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 15(5),802-814.
• 7. Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy?, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18(2), 234-254
• 8. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval:Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(4), 439-461
• 9. Carreiras, M., Perea, M. y Grainger, J, (1997). Effecs of orthographics neighborhood in visual word recognition: cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 23 (4), 857-871
• 10. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E.,Jonasson, J.T. yBesner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. En S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance VI. Nueva York: Academic press.
• 11. Frauenfelder, U.H., Baayen, R.H., Hellwing, F.M. ySchreuder,R. (1993). Neighborhood densityand frecuency across languages and modalities. Journal of Memory and Language, 32,781-804
• 12. Grainger, J. (1988). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition and naming. IPO Annual Progress Report, 23, 92-101.
• 13. Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Languaje, 29, 228-244
• 14. Grainger, J., O'Regan, J.K., Jacobs, A.M. y Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visualword recognition:The neighborhood frequencyeffect. Perception and Psychophysics, 45, 189-195
• 15. Grainger, J., O'Regan, J.K., Jacobs, A.M. y Segui, J. (1992). Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 51(1), 49-56
• 16. Grainger, J. y Seguí, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: a comparison of lexical decision and masked identificaton latencies. Perception an Psychophysics, 47, 191-198.
• 17. Havens, L. L., y Foote, W. E. (1963). The effect of competition on visual duration threshold and its independence of stimulus frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 6-11.
• 18. Howes, D.H., y Solomon, R.L. (1951): Visual duration threshold as a function of word probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 401-410.
• 19. Johnston, J.C. (1978). A test of the sophisticated guessing theory of word perception. Cognitive Psichology, 10, 123-153.
• 20. Juilland, A., y Chang Rodríguez, E. (1964). Frequency Dictionary of Spanish Words. La Haya: Mouton & Co.
• 21. Landauer, T. y Streter, L.A. (1973). Structural differences between common and rare words:Failure of equivalence assumptions fortheories ofwordrecognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 119-131.
• 22. O'Regan, J.K.,Jacobs, A.M. (1992). Optimalviewing positioneffect in word recognition:Achallenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(1), 185-197.
• 23. Perea, M. (1993). Una base de palabras de cuatro letras: Indices de frecuencia, familiaridad y vecindad ortografica. Psicológica, 14(3), 307-317
• 24. Perea, M. yGotor, A. (1994). Las palabras vecinas deben ponderarse:Evidencia mediante la ceguera perceptual. Cognitiva, 6(2), 123-132
• 25. Pollatsek, A., Perea, M. y Binder , K.S. (1999). The Effecs of Neighborhood Size in Reading and Lexical Decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), 1142-1158.
• 26. Savin, H.B. (1963). Word frequency effects and errors in the perception of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, 200-206.
• 27. Scheerer, E. (1987). Visual word recognition in German. En A. Allport, D. MacKay, W. Prinz y E. Scheerer (Eds.) Language, perception and production: Relationship between listening, speaking, reading and writing. Londres: Academic Press.
• 28. Sears, Ch.R., Hino, Y. y Lupker, S.J. (1995). Neighbourhood size and neighbourhood frecuency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(4), 876-900
• 29. Seguí, J. yGrainger,J. (1992). Neighborhood frecuencyand stimulus frecuency effects: Two different but related phenomena?. En J. Alegría, D. Hollander, J. Junça de Morais yM. Radeau(Eds). Analytic approaches to human cognition. Bruselas: Elsevier Science Publishers.
• 30. Solomon, R.L., y Howes, D.H. (1951): Word frequency, personal values and duration thresholds, Psychological Review, 58, 256-270.
• 31. Solomon, R.L,. y Postman, L. (1952). Frequencyofusage as a determinant of recognition thresholds for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 195-201.
• 32. Stone, G.O. yVanOrden, G.C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using desing and systemprinciples.Journalof ExperimentalPsychology:Human Perception and Performance, 20(6), 1248-1268.