Examining age-related differences in support needson the Supports Intensity Scale-Children's Version-Spanish translation

  1. Miguel A. Verdugo 1
  2. Benito Arias 2
  3. Verónica M. Guillén 3
  4. Hyojeong Seo 4
  5. Karrie A. Shogren 5
  6. Leslie A. Shaw 5
  7. James R. Thompson 5
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

  2. 2 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

  3. 3 Universidad de Cantabria
    info

    Universidad de Cantabria

    Santander, España

    ROR https://ror.org/046ffzj20

  4. 4 Kongju National University
    info

    Kongju National University

    Gongju, Corea del Sur

    ROR https://ror.org/0373nm262

  5. 5 University of Kansas
    info

    University of Kansas

    Lawrence, Estados Unidos

    ROR https://ror.org/001tmjg57

Revista:
International journal of clinical and health psychology

ISSN: 1697-2600

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 16

Número: 3

Páginas: 306-314

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJCHP.2016.06.002 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: International journal of clinical and health psychology

Resumen

Background: Interest in the support needs of people with intellectual disability has directed attention to developing assessments to measure of the pattern and intensity of supports which people need to participate in valued life activities. Assessments of the support needs of children must account for the influence of age. Method: Four hundred fifty (450) Spanish children with intellectual disability (ages 5-16) were assessed with the SIS-C Spanish. To test for measurement invariance and latent differences, the SIS-C Spanish standardization sample was linked to the SIS-C English normative sample. Models developed during the norming process were used to investigate measurement equivalence across age groups, differences in latent means, and differences in latent variances and standard deviations. Results: Findings suggested that all items on the SIS-C Spanish could reliably be used to measure support needs of children ages 5-16. When exploring age-related differences at the latent level, however, data showed latent mean differences in support need domain scores across age cohorts. Conclusions: The same set of items can be used to measure support needs in children ages 5-16, but age-related influences must be considered in developing norms for the SIS-C Spanish as well as in planning supports for children.

Información de financiación

Work on this research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of the Economy and Competitiveness (R&D Projects, PSI2012- 36278), and the Autonomous Community of Castile and Leon (R&D Projects, SA120U13)

Financiadores

    • SA120U13
    • PSI2012- 36278

Referencias bibliográficas

  • American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabil-ities, AAIDD (2013). International SIS Use. Retrieved fromhttps://aaidd.org/sis/international#.VsJjahglmi4 on June 24,2016.
  • Arias, B., Verdugo, M. A., Navas, P., & Gómez, L. (2013).Factor structure of the construct of adaptive behavior in chil-dren with and without intellectual disability. InternationalJournal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 13, 155---166.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1697-2600(13)70019-X
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fitindexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equa-tion Modeling, 9, 233---255.
  • Gómez, L. E., Peña, E., Alcedo, M. A., Monsalve, A., Fontail, Y., Verdugo, M. A., Arias, V., & Arias, B. (2014). El constructo de calidadde vida en niños y adolescentes con discapacidades múltiplesy profundas: propuesta para su evaluación. Siglo Cero, 45,56---69.
  • Guillén, V., Verdugo, M. A., Arias, B., & Vicente, E. (2015). Development of a support needs assessment scale for children andadolescents with intellectual disabilities. Anales de Psicología,31, 137---144. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.1.166491
  • Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analysesof cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multi-variate Behavioral Research, 32, 53---76.
  • Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013).Why the item versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psycho-logical Methods, 18, 285---300.
  • Little, T. D., Slegers, D. W., & Card, N. A. (2006). A non-arbitrarymethod of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM andMACS models. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 59---72.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7thed.).Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statisti-cal computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna,Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/
  • Schalock, R. L., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Bradley, V. J., Buntinx, W. H.E., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. M., Gomez, S. C., Lachapelle, Y.,Luckasson, R., Reeve, A., Shogren, K. A., Snell, M. E., Spreat,S., Tassé, M. J., Thompson, J. R., Verdugo, M. A., Wehmeyer,M. L., & Yeager, M. H. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition,classification, and systems of supports (11thed.). Washington,DC: AAIDD.
  • Seo, H., Little, T. D., Shogren, K. A., & Lang, K. M. (2016). On thebenefits of latent variable modeling for norming scales: The caseof the Supports Intensity Scale–Children’s Version. InternationalJournal of Behavioral Development, 40, 373---384.
  • Seo, H., Shaw, L. A., Shogren, K. A., Lang, K. M., & Little, T. D (in press). The Benefits of latent variable modeling to develop normsfor a translated version of a standardized scale. InternationalJournal of Behavioral Development.
  • Shogren, K. A., Seo, H., Wehmeyer, M., Hughes, C., Thompson, J.,Little, T., & Palmer, S. (2015). Support needs of children withintellectual and developmental disabilities: Age-related impli-cations for assessment. Psychology in the Schools, 52, 874---891.
  • Tassé, M. J., & Thompson, J. R. (2010, June). Supports IntensityScale for Children Translation Guidelines. Paper presented atthe 134th Meeting of the American Association on Intellectualand Developmental Disabilities, Providence, RI.
  • Thompson, J. R., Bryant, B., Schalock, R. L., Shogren, K. A., Tasse,M. J., Wehmeyer, M. L., Campbell, E. M., Craig, E. M., Hughes,C., & Rotholz, D. (2015). Supports Intensity Scale---Adult Version: Users manual. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
  • Thompson, J. R., Wehmeyer, M. L., Hughes, C., Shogren, K. A., Seo,H., Little, T. D., Schalock, R., Realon, R. E., Copeland, S. R.,Patton, J. R., Polloway, E., Sheldon, D., Tanis, S., & Tasse, M.J. (2016). Supports Intensity Scale----Children’s Version: User’sManual. Washington, D.C: American Association on Intellectualand Developmental Disabilities.
  • van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). mice: Multivari-ate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of StatisticalSoftware, 45, 1---67.
  • Verdugo, M.A., Arias, B., Guillén, V. M., Seo, H., Shogren, K. A.,Shaw, L.A., & Thompson, J. R. (2016). Spanish Supports IntensityScale---Children’s Version (Spanish SIS-C) User’s Guide. Unpub-lished manuscript.
  • Verdugo, M., Arias, B., Ibañez, A., & Schalock, R. L. (2010).Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS). American Associationon Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115, 496---503.http://dx.doi.org/10.135/1944-7558-115.6.496
  • Verdugo, M. A., Guillén, V., Arias, M., Vicente, E., & Badia, M.(2016). Confirmatory factor Analysis of the Supports Inten-sity Scale for Children. Research in Developmental Disabilities,49---50, 140---152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.022
  • Verdugo, M. A., Vicente, E., Fernández-Pulido, R., Gómez-Vela,M., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Guillén, V. (2015). A psychomet-ric evaluation of the ARC-INICO Self-Determination Scalefor adolescents with intellectual disabilities. InternationalJournal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15, 149---159.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.03.001