Evaluación psicométrica de la psicopatíauna revisión metaanalítica

  1. Benjamín Salvador 1
  2. Ramón Arce 1
  3. Francisco J. Rodríguez-Díaz 2
  4. Dolores Seijo 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

  2. 2 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología

ISSN: 0120-0534

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 49

Número: 1-3

Páginas: 36-47

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.RLP.2015.09.015 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Most of the literature on psychopathy is focused on its measurement. There are four reference tools used to assess psychopathy: the Psychopathy Checklist (PCL), the Levenson's Primary and Secondary Psychopathy Scales (LPSP), the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (SRP), and the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI). In order to do this, a psychometric correlational meta-analysis was designed to test the convergent validity between these tools on the psychopathy dimension and the two common factors among them: the affective and anti-social deviation factors. The results showed a positive, significant and generalisable convergent validity between tools, in the psychopathy dimension, as well as in the affective and anti-social factors. Moreover, the results also showed that the PCL was the most appropriate tool to measure psychopathy in clinical samples, and the PPI was so in sub-clinical cases.

Fuente de los datos: Dialnet