El papel de los centros escolares en la adquisición de la competencia científica

  1. Peña Suárez, Elsa 1
  2. Campillo Álvarez, Ángela 2
  3. Santarén Rosell, Marta 2
  4. Muñiz Fernández, José 2
  1. 1 Gobierno del Principado de Asturias
    info

    Gobierno del Principado de Asturias

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05mj4yh71

  2. 2 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
Revista iberoamericana de psicología y salud

ISSN: 2171-2069

Any de publicació: 2012

Volum: 3

Número: 1

Pàgines: 75-87

Tipus: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Revista iberoamericana de psicología y salud

Resum

The school effects are defined as the influence of educational centers on the pupils' results. School effect size is the percentage of explained variance, which depends on school characteristics. This paper estimates the school size in Scientific Competence, which is evaluated by PISA program. The research establishes several objectives. It aims to estimate the magnitude school effects in the attitudes and capacities and to compare different types of school effects: A gross school effect, which doesn't control context effects and a net school effect, which is adjusted by the school and families socioeconomic status. The sample consists of 17528 Spanish students, whose average age was 15.84 years (SD = 029), and 612 centers. Different multilevel models were developed: Students (level one) and schools (level two). The statistic applied was the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. The results show greater effects in the assessed capacities, over 15%. This percentage was reduced by the net school effect, because the socioeconomic status is a great predictor of students' performance. Nevertheless, it can be concluded that schools in Spain are relevant in acquisition of Scientific Competence

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Aitkin, M., y Longford, N. (1986). Statistical modeling issues in school effectiveness studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 149(Series A), 1-43.
  • Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington: US Goverment Printing Office.
  • Castejón, J. L. (1994). Estabilidad de diversos índices de eficacia de centros educativos. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 24, 45-60.
  • Crone, L. J., Lang, M., Franklin, B. J., y Hallbrook, A. (1994). Composite versus component score: Consistency of school effectiveness classification. Applied Measurement in Education 7, 303-321.
  • Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1991). Multilevel modelling in an indicator system. En S. W. Raudenbush y J. D. Willms (Eds.), Schools classrooms and pupils: International studies of schooling from multilevel perspective (pp. 67-83). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Gray, J., McPherson, A. E., y Raffe, D. (1983). Reconstructions of secondary education: Theory, myth and practice since the war. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Heck, R. K., y Scott, L. T. (2000). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
  • Instituto de Evaluación. (2010). PISA 2009. Programa para la evaluación internacional de los alumnos. OCDE. Informe español. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación. Secretaría de Estado de Educación y Formación Profesional. Dirección General de Evaluación y Cooperación Territorial.
  • Jencks, C. S., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., et al. (1972). Inequality: A reassesment of the effect of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.
  • Kyriakides, L. (2007). Generic and differentiated models of educational effectiveness. Implications for the improvement of educational practice. En T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 41- 56). New York: Springer.
  • Kochan, S. E., Tashakkori, A., y Teddlie, C. (1996, Abril). You can’t judge a high school by test data alone: Constructing an alternative indicator of secondary school effectiveness. Comunicación presentada en el Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
  • Mandeville, G. K., y Anderson, L. W. (1987). The stability of school effectiveness indices across grade level and subjects areas. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 203-216.
  • Marchesi, A., y Martínez-Arias, R. (Eds.). (2006). Escuelas de éxito en España. Sugerencias e interrogantes a partir del informe PISA 2003: Madrid: Fundación Santillana.
  • Martín, E., Martínez-Arias, R., Marchesi, A., y Pérez, E. M. (2008). Variables that predict academic achievement in the Spanish compulsory secondary educational system: A longitudinal multi-level analysis. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 400-413.
  • Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D., y Ecob, R. (1988). The effects of school membership on pupil´s educational outcomes. Research Papers in Education, 3, 3-26.
  • Murillo-Torrecilla, J. (2005). La investigación sobre eficacia escolar. Barcelona: Octoedro.
  • Murillo-Torrecilla, J. (2004). Aportaciones de la investigación sobre eficacia escolar. Un estudio multinivel sobre los efectos escolares y los factores de eficacia de los centros docentes de primaria en España. Tesis doctoral no publicada, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
  • Murillo-Torrecilla, J. (2007). Investigación iberoamericana sobre eficacia escolar. Bogotá: Convenio Andrés Bello.
  • Murillo-Torrecilla, J. (2011). Mejora de la eficacia escolar en Iberoamérica. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 55, 49-83.
  • Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos. (2006). PISA 2006. Marco de la evaluación. Conocimientos y habilidades en ciencias, matemáticas y lectura. Madrid: Santillana.
  • Pajares-Box, R. (2005). Resultados en España del estudio Pisa 2000. Conocimientos y destrezas de los alumnos de 15 años. Madrid: INECSE.
  • Purkey, S. C., y Smith, M. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. Elementary School Journal, 4, 427-452.
  • Reynolds, D. (1976). The delinquent school. En P.Woods (Ed.), The process of schooling (pp. 124-178). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Rodríguez-Jiménez, O. R., y Murillo-Torrecilla, F. J. (2011). Estimación del efecto escuela para Colombia. Magis, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 3(6), 299-316.
  • Rutter, M., Mortimore, P., Ouston, J., y Maughan, B. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours. London: Open Books.
  • Sammons, P., Nuttall, D. L., y Cuttance, P. (1993). Differential school effectiveness: Results from reanalysis of the inner London Education Authority´s Junior School Project Data. British Educational Research Journal, 4, 381-405.
  • Teddlie, C., Reynolds, D., y Sammons, P. (2000). The methodology and scientific properties of school effectiveness research. En C. Teddlie y D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 55-133). London: Falmer Press.
  • Thomas, S., Sammons, P., y Mortimore, P. (1997). Stability and consistency in Secundary school's effects on student's GCSE outcomes over three years. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, 169-197.
  • Towsend, T. (Ed.). (2007). International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement. New York: Springer.
  • Willms, J. D., y Raudenbush, S. W. (1989). A longitudinal hierarchical linear model for estimating school effects and their stability. Journal of Education Measurement, 26, 209-232.
  • Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., y Wilson, M. R. (1997). Conquest: Multi-aspect test software [computer program]. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Education Research.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet