Brief assessment of physical and social Anhedonia traits

  1. Fonseca-Pedrero, E. 36
  2. Gooding, D.C. 5
  3. Ortuño-Sierra, J. 3
  4. Paino, M. 46
  5. Debbané, M. 117
  6. Muñiz, J. 24
  1. 1 Université de Genève
    info

    Université de Genève

    Ginebra, Suiza

    ROR https://ror.org/01swzsf04

  2. 2 Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Salud Mental
    info

    Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Salud Mental

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/009byq155

  3. 3 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

  4. 4 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

  5. 5 University of Wisconsin–Madison
    info

    University of Wisconsin–Madison

    Madison, Estados Unidos

    ROR https://ror.org/01y2jtd41

  6. 6 Prevention Program for Psychosis (P3), Oviedo, Spain
  7. 7 University College London
    info

    University College London

    Londres, Reino Unido

    ROR https://ror.org/02jx3x895

Buch:
Advances in Psychology Research

ISBN: 9781634824835 9781634824590

Datum der Publikation: 2015

Ausgabe: 107

Seiten: 11-35

Art: Buch-Kapitel

Zusammenfassung

Anhedonia has been hypothesized as a latent trait underlying risk for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. The main goal of the present study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the brief versions of the Physical Anhedonia Scale (PhyS-B) and the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (RSAS-B). The final sample comprised a total of 1349 college students divided into two subsamples (n1=710; n2=639). Results showed that both instruments have adequate psychometric properties under Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory frameworks. Internal structure analysis of PhyS-B and RSAS-B scores, through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, yielded an essentially one-dimensional solution. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total score of PhyS-B ranged between 0.86 and 0.87, and between 0.88 and 0.94 for the RSAS-B. Several items showed differential functioning by gender. The results indicate that the short version of the Physical and Social Anhedonia Scales show adequate psychometric properties for the assessment of the negative dimension of schizotypy in this sample of young adults. Replication and follow-up studies are necessary to confirm the validity and clinical relevance of these scales. © 2015 by Nova Science Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved.