Atención primaria y péptidos natriuréticosdiseño de un proceso asistencial para la mejora en el diagnóstico de la insuficiencia cardiaca

  1. Javier Cuevas Pérez
  2. Daniel Moro Quesada
  3. Vanesa Alonso Fernández
  4. Miguel Ángel Prieto Díaz
  5. Mª Belén Prieto García
  6. Pablo Herrero Puente
  7. Valentina Chiminazzo
  8. Raúl Ludeña Martín-Tesorero 1
  9. Jesús María de la Hera Galarza
  1. 1 Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
    info

    Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03v85ar63

Journal:
Semergen: revista española de medicina de familia

ISSN: 1138-3593

Year of publication: 2024

Issue: 7

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.SEMERG.2024.102224 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Semergen: revista española de medicina de familia

Abstract

Introduction There are few data about the optimal use of natriuretic peptides (NP) in the Primary Care (PC) setting. The aim to assess how, through a common coordinated PC-hospital care pathway, the use of NPs in patients with suspected heart failure (HF) is improved. Material and methods Analytical, experimental, prospective, non-randomized study. An intervention group composed of 22 PC physicians from 2 health centers is provided with face-to-face training and a consensual protocol is attached with a cut-off point of NT-proBNP > 300 pg/mL as pathological. The control group is made up of the rest of PC physicians in the healthcare area. The aim is to compare the use and results of PN in both groups. Propensity analysis is performed so thar the patient populations with requested PN are comparable. Results From June 2021 to March 2022, NP was requested in 103 and 105 patients in the intervention/control groups. Both populations were similar, with equal HF risk. Symptomatology was present in 100% of intervention vs 41% of asymptomatic patients in the control group (p < 0.001). ECG was performed in 100% vs 33.3%, p < 0.001. Optimal NP indication in 76.7% vs 29.5%, p < 0.001. In the intervention group more patients with NT-proBNP > 300 pg/mL are referred to cardiology consultations (76.6% vs 27.2%, p 0.001). Conclusion The optimal indication for NP and its interpretation as a diagnostic tool for HF, in the PC setting seems not to be appropriate, but improvable with a coordinated and multidisciplinary intervention approach.