Valoración del alumnado y profesorado del material convencional y auto-construidoestudio longitudinal de diseño cruzado en Educación Deportiva

  1. Antonio Méndez-Giménez 2
  2. Diego Martínez de Ojeda Pérez 1
  3. Juan José Valverde-Pérez 1
  1. 1 CEIP Profesor Enrique Tierno Lobosillo, Murcia, España
  2. 2 Universidad de Oviedo, España
Journal:
Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

ISSN: 1579-1726,  1988-2041

Year of publication: 2016

Issue: 30

Pages: 20-25

Type: Article

DOI: 10.47197/RETOS.V0I30.35725 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Currently, the Sport Education model stands out among the teaching approaches centered on the students and having a higher impact on the Physical Education teachers. The benefits of the hybridization based on self-made materials have not been studied either longitudinally or in Primary Education. The objective was to know and to compare the assessment of teachers and their students regarding the use of two types of materials (conventional and self-made) during two consecutive Sport Education seasons. A total of 51 students enrolled in grades 3 and 4 of Primary Education and their two Physical Education teachers took part in the experience. We used a quasi-experimental simple crossover design with randomized groups and non-probabilistic convenience sampling, in which the two levels of the independent variable (conventional and self-made materials) were applied in the two grade levels participating in the study. Data were collected by means of teacher diaries, group interviews with the students and individual interviews with the teachers, before and after implementation of each of the following didactic units: «ultimate» and «indiacas». Data collection was performed using constant comparisons. The results showed a high level of students’ enthusiasm during both didactic units, although the data analyzed indicated a methodological inertia to the self-made material, according to the order type of the used material. Besides, it was found that the self-made material encourages participation in extracurricular physical activities. Further studies are required to analyze physical activity levels in and outside the Physical Education setting as a function of the material used.

Bibliographic References

  • Araújo, R., Mesquita, I., & Hastie, P.A. (2014). Review of the Status of Learning in Research on Sport Education: Future Research and Practice. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 13, 846-858.
  • Barbier, R. (1997). L´Approche Transversale. L´écoute sensible en sciences humaines. París: Anthropos.
  • Bardin, L. (2002). Análisis de contenido. Madrid: Ediciones Akal. Browne, T. B., Carlson, T. B., & Hastie, P. A. (2004). A comparison of rugby seasons presented in traditional and sport education formats. European Physical Education Review, 10(2), 199-214.
  • Calderón, A., Martínez de Ojeda, D., & Martínez, I. M. (2013). Influencia de la habilidad física percibida sobre la actitud de alumnos tras una unidad didáctica con Educación Deportiva. Retos. Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 24, 16-21.
  • Chen, W., Cone, T. P., & Cone, S. L. (2007). A Collaborative Approach to Developing an Interdisciplinary Unit. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26, 103-124.
  • Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A.L. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage publications.
  • Ennis, C. D., & Chen, S. (2012). Interviews and focus groups. En Armour, K., Macdonald, D. (Ed.), Research Methods in Physical Eduction and Youth Sport. (p. 217-236). New York: Routledge.
  • Fernández-Río, J., & Méndez-Giménez, A. (2013). Articulando conocimiento teórico y práctica educativa. Una investigación longitudinal sobre los efectos del material autoconstruido en futuros docentes. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 36(1), 61-75.
  • Fernández-Río, J., Méndez-Giménez, A., & Méndez-Alonso, D. (2013). Efectos de tres modelos de enseñanza en el autoconcepto de los adolescentes. Cultura y Educación. Revista de teoría, investigación y práctica, 25(4), 509-521.
  • Hastie, P. A., Sluder, J. B., Buchanan, A. M., & Wadsworth, D. D. (2009). The impact of an obstacle course sport education season on students’ aerobic fitness levels. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 80(4), 788-791.
  • Hastie, P. A., Martínez de Ojeda, D., & Calderón, A. (2011). A review of research on Sport Education: 2004 to the present. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 16(2), 103-132. doi:10.1080/ 17408989.2010.535202
  • Hastie, P., Calderón, A., Rolim, R., & Guarino, A. J. (2013) The Development of Skill and Knowledge During a Sport Education Season of Track and Field Athletics. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 84, 336-344. doi:10.1080/02701367.2013.812001
  • Hastie, P. A., Sinelnikov, O. A., & Guarino, A. J. (2009). The development of skill and tactical competencies during a season of badminton. European Journal of Sport Science, 9(3), 133-140. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/17461390802542564
  • Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1980). Models of teaching (2ª ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Jurado, M. D. (2011). El diario como instrumento de autoformación e investigación. Revista Qurriculum, 24, 173-200.
  • Lee, A. M., & Solmon, M. (2005) Pedagogy research through the years in RQES. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76(2), 108121. doi: 10.5641/027013605X13100559650245
  • Metzler, M. W. (2011). Instructional models for physical education (2nd ed.). Scottsdale. AZ: Holcomb Hathaway Publishing.
  • Méndez-Giménez, A. (2003). Nuevas propuestas lúdicas para el desarrollo curricular de Educación Física. Juegos con material alternativo, juegos predeportivos y juegos multiculturales. Barcelona. Pai-dotribo.
  • Méndez Giménez, A. (2009) (coord.). Modelos actuales de iniciación deportiva escolar. Unidades didácticas sobre deportes de invasión. Sevilla: Ed. Wanceulen.
  • Méndez Giménez, A. (2011) (coord.). Modelos actuales de iniciación deportiva escolar. Unidades didácticas sobre juegos y deportes de cancha dividida. Sevilla: Ed. Wanceulen.
  • Méndez-Giménez, A. (coord.) (2014). Modelos de enseñanza en educación física: unidades didácticas de juegos deportivos de diana móvil, golpeo y fildeo y pared. Madrid: Editorial Grupo 5.
  • Méndez-Giménez, A., Cecchini-Estrada, J. A., & Fernández-Río, J. (en revisión). Efecto del material autoconstruido en la actividad física de los niños durante el recreo. Revista de Saúde Pública.
  • Méndez-Giménez, A., Fernández-Río, J, & Méndez-Alonso, D. (2012). Valoración de los adolescentes del uso de materiales autoconstruidos en educación física. Retos. Nuevas tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y recreación, 22, 24-28.
  • Méndez-Giménez, A., Fernández-Río, J., & Méndez-Alonso, D. (2015). Modelo de educación deportiva versus modelo tradicional: efectos en la motivación y deportividad. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte, 15(59), 449-466.
  • Méndez-Giménez, A., Martínez-Maseda, J., & Fernández-Río, J. (2010). Impacto de los materiales autoconstruidos sobre la diversión, aprendizaje, satisfacción, motivación y expectativas del alumnado de primaria en la enseñanza del paladós. Congreso Internacional AIESEP. Los profesionales de la educación física en la promoción de un estilo de vida activo. A Coruña, 26-29 de octubre 2010. CDRom.
  • Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Source Book for New Methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. Chapter 1: Situating Constructionism. New York: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Parker, M. B., & Curtner-Smith, M. (2005). Health-related fitness in sport education and multi-activity teaching. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 10 (1), 1-18.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pereira, J., Hastie, P., Araújo, R., Farias, C., Rolim, R., & Mesquita, I. (2015). A comparative study of Students, track and field technical performance in Sport Education and in Direct Instruction approach. Journal of Sport Science and Medicine,14, 118-127.
  • Pill, S., Penney, D., & Swabey, K. (2012). Rethinking sport teaching in physical education: a case study of research based innovation in teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(8), 118-138. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2012v37n8.2
  • Pritchard, T., Hawkins, A., Wiegand, R., & Metzler, J. N. (2008). Effects of two instructional approaches on skill development, knowledge, and game performance. Measurement in Physical Education & Exercise Science, 12 (4), 219-236. doi: 10.1080/ 10913670802349774
  • Sánchez, B., Byra, M., & Wallhead, T. (2012). Students’ perceptions of the command, practice, and inclusion styles of teaching. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 17(3), 317-330. doi:10.1080/ 17408989.2012.690864
  • Siedentop, D. (1994). Sport education: Quality PE through positive sport experiences. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Siedentop, D., Hastie, P. A., & van Der Mars, H. (2011). Complete Guide to Sport Education. (2nd. Ed.), Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Spittle, M., & Byrne, K. (2009). The influence of Sport Education on student motivation in physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 14(3), 253-266.
  • Thomas, J. R., Nelson, J. K., & Silverman, S. (2005). Research methods in physical activity (5th ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Wallhead, T., & O’Sullivan, M. (2005). Sport education: Physical education for the new millennium? Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 10 (2), 181-210. doi: 10.1080/17408980500105098
Data source: Dialnet