Determinantes de la divulgación de información contable a través de Internet por parte de los gobiernos locales

  1. Cárcaba García, Ana 1
  2. García García, Jesús 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Journal:
Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

ISSN: 0210-2412

Year of publication: 2008

Issue: 137

Pages: 63-84

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1080/02102412.2008.10779639 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

Bibliographic References

  • BASER, W. R. 1983. Towards understanding the role of auditing in the public sector, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5 (1), 213-227.
  • BABER, W. R., y SEN, R. K. 1984. The role of generally accepted reporting methods in the public sector: an empirical test, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 3 (2), 91-106.
  • BONSÓN PONTE, E., Coord. 2001. Los Estados Financieros en Internet, Madrid: Ra-Ma.
  • BONSÓN PONTE, E., y GANDÍA CABEDO, J. L. 2002. Código de Buenas Prácticas para la Divulgación de Información Financiera en Internet, Documento no. 1 de la Comisión de Nuevas Tecnologías y Contabilidad, Madrid: AECA.
  • BRADBURY, M. 1992. Voluntary disclosure of financial segment data: New Zealand evidence, Accounting and Finance 32 (1), 15-26.
  • BUZBY, S. L. 1975. Company size, listed versus unlisted stocks, and the extent of financial disclosure, Journal of Accounting Research, 13 (Spring), 16-37.
  • CÁRCABA GARCÍA, A., y GARCÍA GARCÍA, J. 2003. La información financiera en Internet de las corporaciones locales europeas, Partida doble 144, 56-69.
  • CERF, A. R. 1961. Corporate Reporting and Investment Decision, Berkley, California: University of California Press.
  • CHENG, R. H. 1992. An Empirical Analysis of Theories on Factors Influencing State Government Accounting Disclosure, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 11 (1), 1-42.
  • CHOW, C. W., y WONG-BOREN, A. 1987. Voluntary financial disclosure by Mexican corporations, The Accounting Review 62 (3), 533-541.
  • CHRISTIAENS, J. 1999. Financial accounting reform in Flemish municipalities: An empirical investigation, Financial Accountability and Management 15 (issue 1), 21-40.
  • Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, CICA. 1999. The Impact of Technology on Financial and Business Reporting, Toronto: CICA.
  • CHEN, y N.; CHEN, H. M.: HUANG, W., y CHMG, R. K. H. 2006. E-Government Strategies in Developed and Developing Countries: An Implementation Framework and Case Study, Journal of Global Information Management, 14 (1), 23-46.
  • COMISIÓN EUROPEA, CE. 1998. Libro Verde sobre la Información del Sector Público en la Sociedad de la Información, COM (1998) 585, Luxemburgo: CE.
  • COOKE, T. 1991. An assessment of voluntary disclosure in the annual reports of Japanese corporations, The International Journal of Accounting 26 (3), 174-189.
  • DEBRECENY, R.; GRAY, G., y RAHMAN, A. 2002. The determinants of Internet financial reporting, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 21 (4-5), 371-394.
  • DHALIWAL, D. S. 1980. Improving the quality of corporate financial disclosure, Accounting and Business Research 10 (Autumn), 385-391.
  • EVANS III, J. H., y PATTON, J. M. 1987. Signalling and monitoring in public-sector accounting, Journal of Accounting Research 25 (Suppl.), 130-158.
  • FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD, FASB. 2000. Business Reporting Research Project: Electronic Distribution of Business Reporting Information, Steering Committee Report Series, Norwalk: FASB. Disponible en http://www.fasb.org (acceso el 8 de enero de 2008).
  • FIRTH, M. 1979. The impact of size, stock market listing, and auditors on voluntary disclosure in corporate annual reports, Accounting and Business Research 9 (36), 273-280.
  • GANDÍA CABEDO, J. L. 2001. La Divulgación de Información Financiera en la Era Digital, Madrid: Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas (AECA).
  • Giner Inchausti, B. 1997. The influence of company characteristics and accounting regulation on information disclosed by Spanish firms, The European Accounting Review 6 (1), 45-68.
  • GIROUX, G. 1989. Political Interests and Governmental Accounting Disclosure, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 8, 199-217.
  • GLYNN, J. J. 1985. Value for Money Auditing in the Public Sector, New York: Prentice-Hall.
  • GONZÁLEZ DÍAZ, B. 2005. La actuación de los órganos de control externo en la fiscalización de las universidades públicas, Hacienda Pública Española 172 (1/2005), 145-177.
  • GORE, A. K. 2004. The effects of GAAP regulation and bond market interaction on local government disclosure, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23 (1), 23-52.
  • GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD, GASB. 1987. Objectives of Financial Reporting, Concepts Statement no. 1, Norwalk: GASB.
  • HILLER, J., y BÉLANGER, F. 2001. Privacy Strategies for Electronic Government, E-Government Series, Arlington VA: PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government.
  • INGRAM, R. W. 1984. Economic incentives and the choice of state government accounting practices, Journal of Accounting Research 22 (1), 126-144.
  • INGRAM, R. W., y DEJONG, D. V. 1987. The effect of regulation on local government disclosure practices, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 6 (4), 245-270.
  • INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS IN ENGLAND AND WALES, ICAEW. 1997. Corporate Dialogue in the Digital Age, London: ICAEW.
  • INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD, IASB. 1999. Business Reporting on the Internet, IASR, London, disponible en www.iasb.org (acceso el 8 de enero de 2008).
  • INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF ACCOUNTANTS IFAC. 1998. Guideline for Governmental Financial Reporting, Exposure Draft, New York: IFAC.
  • INTEROPERABLE DELIVERY OF EUROPEAN EGOVERNMENT SERVICES TO PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS, BUSINESSES AND CITIZENS, IDABC. 2006. Overview of the eGovernment Situation and Progress in EU Member States, Brussels: European Commission, disponible en: http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/en/chapter/203 (acceso el 8 de enero de 2008).
  • JUSTICE, J. B.; MELITSKI, J., y SMITH, D. L.. 2006. E-Government as an instrument of fiscal accountability and responsiveness: do the best practitioners employ the best practices?, The American Review of Public Administration 36 (September), 301-322.
  • LARRÁN, M., y GINER, B. 2002. The use of the Internet for corporate reporting by Spanish companies, The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research 2 (1), 53-82.
  • LASWAD, F.; FISHER, R., y OYERELE, P. 2005. Determinants of voluntary Internet financial reporting by local government authorities, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24 (2), 101-121.
  • LYMER, A. 1999. The Internet and the future of corporate reporting in Europe, European Accounting Review 8 (2), 289-302.
  • MALONE, D.; FRIES, C, y JONES, T. 1993. An empirical investigation of the extent of corporate financial disclosure in the oil and gas industry, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 8 (3), 249-273.
  • MINISTERIO DE ADMINISTRACIONES PÚBLICAS, MAP. 2005. Guía para la Edición y Publicación de las Páginas Web de la Administración General del Estado (resolución de 9 de marzo de 2005 de la Secretaría General para la Administración Pública), Madrid: MAP.
  • MOON, M. J. 2002. The evolution of e-governraent among municipalities: rhetoric or reality, Public Administration Review 62 (4), 424-433.
  • ROBBINS, W A., y AUSTIN, K. R. 1986. Disclosure quality in governmental financial reports: an assessment of the appropriateness of a compound measure, Journal of Accounting Research 24 (2), 412-421.
  • SINGHVI, S., y DESAI, IT. 1971. An empirical analysis of the quality of corporate financial disclosure, The Accounting Review, 46 January, 129-138.
  • TORRES, L.; PINA, V, y ACERETE, B. 2006. E-Governance Developments in European Union Cities: Reshaping Government's Relationship with Citizens, Governance, 19 (2), 277-302.
  • TORRES, L.; PINA, V, y ROYO, S. 2005. E-government and the transformation of public administrations in EU countries: Beyond NPM or just a second wave of reforms?, Online Information Review 29 (5), 531-553.
  • UNITED NATIONS y AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, UN/ASPA. 2001. Global Survey of E-Government, New York: UN/ASPA
  • ZIMMERMAN, J. L. 1977. The municipal accounting maze: an analysis of political incentives, Journal of Accounting Research 15 (suppl.), 107-144.