Sovereignty in British Legal Doctrine

Bibliographic References

• Cuadernos Monográficos de Teoría del Estado, Derecho Público e Historia Constitucional", Junta General del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, 1998, pp. 87-165
• The electronic journal of this University, "E-Law", published for the first time the english edition of this article in September 1999 (volume 6, number 3)
• S.E Thorne and published in association with Selden Society, The Belknap Press, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1968, 4 Viol. Vol., 1. P.XL.
• George E. Woodbine Bracton, De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae, New Haven; Prensa de la Universidad de Yale, Londres: Humphrey Mildford, Oxford University Press (OUP), 1915, 4 vol.
• Charles Howard McIllwain, Cosntitucionalismo antiguo y moderno, Centro de Estudios Constitucionales (CEC), Madrid, 1991, p.91.
• F.W. Maitland, The Constitutional History of England (1908), edited by H.A.L. Fisher, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 1968, pp 54-92;
• On the Laws and Customs of England, bilingual edition cited from Samuel E. Thorne, vol.II, p.33. Trans.: " the king must not be under man but under God and under the Law, because law makes the King"
• Alessandro Passerin D'Entréves, La Noción del Estado, Centro de Estudios Universitarios, Madrid, 1970, p.103.
• [Political Theories of the Middle Ages]"Estudio Preliminar' by Benigno Pendás, "Introduction" by F.W. Maitland, Spanish Translation by Piedad García-Escudero, Centro de Estudios Constitucionales (CEC) Madrid, 1995.
• Revista Española de Derecho Constitucionales", nº 49, enero-abril, Madrid, 1997, págs. 335-351
• Los Dos Cuerpos del Rey. Un estudio de Teología Política Medieval. dos encarnaciones del rey. Un estudio de teología política medieval], Ernest H. Kantorowicz, Alianza Universidad, 1985, pp.114.
• R.W. & A.J. Carlyle, A History of Medieval Political Theory in the West, Blackwood & Sons, Edinburgh, 1903
• A.J. Carlyle La libertad politica. Historia de su concepto en la Edad Media y los tiempos modernos, FCE, México, Madrid, Buenos Aires, pp.23.
• A Prasie of the Laws of England, capítulos IX y XVIII.
• Shelley Lockwood, Sir John Fortescue, On the Laws and Gobernanza de Inglaterra, Textos de Cambridge en la historia del pensamiento político, CUP, 1997
• Parlamento durante el siglo XIII. El sistema parlamentario de gobierno, en Ensayos de Gobierno, Oxford University Press, 1965, p.59
• Actas de la Conferencia sobre este tema celebrada en León (España), septiembre de 1988 y publicado en 1990 por las Cortes de Castilla y León, titulado "Las Cortes de Castilla y León 1188-1988, Valladolid, 2 Vol
• O. Hood Phillips, Derecho Constitucional y Administrativo, Sweets & Maxwell, Londres, 7ª ed., 1987.
• G.R. Elton, The Tudor Constitution Documents and Documentary, CUP, 2nd ed., 1986.
• Algunos problemas de la Constitución, Biblioteca de la Universidad de Hutchinson, Londres, 5ª ed., 1971, p.15
• Thomas Smith, De Republica Anglorum. A Discourse on the Commonwealth of England, Book II, chapter 1, L Alston (ed), with an introduction by FW Maitland, CUP, 1906, pp. 48-49
• Richard Hooker, Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Politie, Book VIII, ch. 6, Arthur Stephen Mcgrade, CUP, 1989, p 192.
• Política Eclesiástica de Hooker: Libro VIII Columbia University Press, Nueva York, 1931
• Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Politie. Book VIII, ch.6.
• Howell A. Lloyd, Constitutionalism, en The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450-1700, editado por J.H. Burns, CUP, 1991, pp.279-283.
• Paulette Carrive, Richard Hooker, Théologie et Politique, en La Pensée Politique Anglaise de Hooker a Hume, Presses Universitaires de France, París, 1994, pp. 3-31.
• J.W. Allen recuerda en A History of Political Thought en the 16th Century, Londres, 1941, págs. 247.
• Platón, Las Leyes libro III; de la edición bilingüe (español-griego) del IEP, Madrid, 1960, traducción, notas y prólogo de José Manuel Pabón y Manuel Fernández Galiano, vol. 2
• Aristóteles, Política, Libros III, cap. 6-8, IV, cap. 4-12 y VI
• Santo Tomás de Aquino, De Regimine Principum, Libro I, cap. VI; de la versión latina de Marietti, Turín, reimpresa en 1971
• La Monarquía, Madrid, 3ª ed., 1995, Prólogo, traducción y notas de Laureano Robles y Angel Chueca.
• Jean Bodin, Les Six Livres de la República, Libro I, Capítulo II.
• Corpus des Ouvres de Philosophie en Langue Francaise. Fayard, París, 1986, 6 tomos
• Jean Bodin, Les Six Livres de la Republique, Book II, ch I to VII.
• W. Ullmann expands on this in Principios de Gobierno y Politica en la Edad media [Principles of Government and Politics during the Middle Ages] Alianza Universidad, 1985, pp. 171, 207.
• Manuel García Pelayo, Derecho Constitucional Comparado, Alianza Universidad, Madrid, 1984, pp. 250-251, traducción de Manuel Calzada.
• J.P. Kenyon, The Stuart Constitution, 1603-1688, Documents and Commentary, CUP, 2nd ed., 1986, p.11.
• G.P. Gooch, Political Thought in England: from Bacon to Halifax, OUP, London, 1955, reprinted by AMS Press, New York, 1977, pp. 13-22.
• J.W. Allen, English political Thought, 1603-1660, London, 1983, Vol. 2,
• Conal Condren, The Language of Politics in Seventeenth Century England, St. Martin's Press, New York, 1994
• John A. Pocock, La riconstruzione di un imperio. Sovranitá britannica e federalismo americano, Piero Lacaita Editore, Manduria, Bari, Roma, 1996, p.16
• Mauro Capelletti, Alcuni precedenti storici del controllo giudiziario delle leggi, in Giuseppe Maranini (ed), La Giustizia Constituzionale, Vallecchi Editori, Florencia, p.23.
• Edward S. Corwin, The "Higher Law" background of American Constitutional Law, II, "Harvard Law review" No 3 (1929), pp. 366-380
• Constitution and Law in the origins of the Liberal State] Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, no 45, 1995, pp. 347- 365.
• The Ancient Constitution abd the Feudal law, Cambridge, 1957, reeditado en 1987.
• Glenn Burgess, The Politics of the Ancient Constitution: An Introduction to English Political Thought, 1600-1642, Macmillan, London, 1992, ch. 1 and 2.
• C.H. Macilwain, The High Court of Parliament and its Supremacy, 1912, p. 390.
• Geoffrey Marshall, Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Commonwealth, OUP, 1957, p. 48.
• Documents of the Puritan Revolution, 1625-1660, selected and edited by Samuel Rawson Gardiner, 3rd revised edition, OUP, reprinted 1968, 249-254.
• Corinne C. Weston and Janelle R. Greenberg, Subjects and Sovereigns, the Great Debate over Sovereignty in Stuart England, Cambridge, 1981
• Michael J. Meedle, posiciones peligrosas: gobierno mixto, estates, y la Respuesta a las XIX Proposiciones, Alabama, 1985
• M.J.C. Vil, Constitucionalismo y la Separación de Poderes, OUP, Oxford, 1967 p.37
• Johann P. Sommerville, Introducción a Filmer, Patriarca y otros escritos, CUP, Oxford, 1991, págs. XV-XVIII, XXXII a XXXIV.
• Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan or The Matter, Forme and Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiastical and Civil, London, 1651. First part, ch. XV in fine. Penguin Books Edition , London, 1984, with an Introduction by C.B. Mapherson.
• Norberto Bobbio, Legge naturale e legge civile nella filosofia politica de Hobbes y Hobbes e il giusnaturismo, ambos en su libro Da Hobbes a Marx, Morano editore, 2ª edición, 1971, págs. 11-74.
• Cattaneo, en su libro Il positivismo giuridico inglese. Hobbes, Bentham, Austin (Milán, 1962), considera a Hobbes como "el primer representante de la positivismo”, p.46.
• W.C. Costin and J. Steven Watson, The Law and Working of the Constitution. Documents. Adam and Charles Black, London, 2nd ed., 1961, Vol. 2 1660-1914, Vol. 1 , pp. 67-74.
• Joaquín Varela Suanzes, "Textos basicos de la Historia Constitucional Comparada" CEC, Madrid, 1998, pp. 18-25.
• Peter Laslett, The English Revolution and Locke's Two Treatises of Government, inicialmente publicado en el Cambridge Historical Journal, vol. 12, núm. 1, pp. 40-55
• John Locke. Critical Assessments, editado por Richard Ashcraft, Routledge, Londres y Nueva York, 1991, vol. 1, págs. 32-50
• J.R. Milton, Dating Locke's Second Treatise in Historia del pensamiento político, vol. XVI, n. 3, otoño, 1995, págs. 356-7.
• Locke en An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, véase J. L. Mackie Problems from Locke, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1976.
• Shadia B. Drury, Douglass Odegard y Sterling P. Lamprecht en Vols II y IV de John Locke, Critical Evaluaciones, editado por Richard Ashcreft, Routledge, Londres y Nueva York, 1991.
• Historia de la Teoría Política, FCE, México-Madrid-Buenos Aires, 1981, pág. 391.
• Ensayo sobre la verdadera extensión original y el fin del gobierno civil, capítulo XIV, paraca. 159, Biblioteca de todos
• John Locke, Two Treatises of Government, Londres, 1986, con una introducción de W.S. Carpintero.
• Jules Steinberg, Locke, Rousseau and the Idea of ​​Consent. Una investigación en la Teoría Liberal-Demócrata de la Obligación Política. Prensa de Greenwood, Westport, Connecticut, Londres, Inglaterra, 1940, cap. 3 "Locke y la idea del consentimiento", pp. 53-79.
• Un ensayo sobre la verdadera extensión original y el fin del gobierno civil, ed. Cit. cap. yo, yo, y VII-XIV.
• John Dunn conocida obra El pensamiento político de John Locke. Una cuenta histórica del argumento de los "Dos Tratados de Gobierno". COPA, 1969, págs. 77.
• M.J.C. Vile, Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers, OUP, Oxford, 1967, ch. 2 & 3, pp. 55-57.
• An Essay concerning the True original Extent and End of Civil Government, ed. cit. ch. IX, Paras 128,129,130.
• M.J.C. Vile, Constitutionalism 1/4 op. cit. p. 59.
• Historia del constitucionalismo moderno. UTET, Turín, 1988, pag. 104.
• True Original Extent and End of Civil Government, ed. cit. ch. XIV, para 159.
• George Macaulay Trevelyan, Historia Politica de Inglaterra [English Political History]. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 2nd ed. 1984, p.284.
• M.J.C. Vile in the book already cited, p.60. Regarding Locke's doctrine of the division of powers see pp. 58-67.
• True Original Extent and End of Civil Government ed. cit, ch. XII, para. 147.
• Alessandro Passerin D'Entreves, La Noción del Estado. Centro de Estudios Universitarios, Madrid, 1970, p. 138, and generally Chapter 7, part 2. "Estado mixto y division de poder' .
• An essay concerning the True Original Extent and End of Civil Government ed. cit., para. 132
• J.W. Gough, Fundamental Laws in English Constitutional History, OUP, 1955, reprint by Fred B. Rothman & Co, Colorado, USA, 1985, p.167.
• Julian H. Franklin, John Locke y la Teoría de la Soberanía. Monarquía mixta y el derecho de resistencia, CUP, Cambridge, 1981, págs. 91-97
• Locke's Liberalism, The Prensa de la Universidad de Chicago, Chicago y Londres, 1987
• A.H. Maclean, George Lawson and John Locke in "Cambridge Historical Journal", IX, no. 1, 1947, pp 68-77, reproduced in the previously cited book John Locke. Critical Assessments, Vol. 1 pp. 110-119.
• Basil Williams, The Supremacía Whig, 1714-1760 Oxford History of England, 2ª edición, revisada por C.H. estuardo, OUP, 1962
• RR Walcott Jr. Política del partido inglés a principios del siglo XVIII , CUP, 1965.
• J H. Plumb, El crecimiento de la estabilidad política en Inglaterra, 1675-1725, Londres, 1967
• WA mota Tory y Whig. The Struggle in the Constituencies: 1701-1715, Londres, 1970
• E. Neville Williams, La Constitución del siglo XVIII, 1688-1715, OUP, 1985
• Jeremy Black, Roberto Walpole y la naturaleza de la política a principios del siglo XVIII en Inglaterra, Macmillan, Londres, 1990
• J.H. Plumb, Sir Robert Walpole, Vol. 1, The Making of a Statement, London, 1956 and Vol. 2, The King's Minister, 1961;
• H.T. Dickinson, Bollingbroke, Constable, London, 1976;
• Isaac Kramnick, Bollingbroke and his Circle. The Politics of Nostalgia in the Age of Walpole, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, 1992.
• Joaquin Varela Suanzes, Estado y Monarquia en Hume, Revista del Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, nº 22, Madrid, 1995, pp. 59-90.
• De los partidos de Gran Bretaña, Vol., 3, pp. 133-144 de David Hume
• Obras filosóficas, editado por Thomas Hill y Thomas Hodge Grose, vol. 4, Londres, 1882- 1886, reimpreso por Scientia Verlag Aalen, 1964.
• 1758. Ensayos morales, políticos y literarios.
• Of passive obedience, Vol. 3, pp. 460-1
• Leslie Stephen, History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century, London, 1881, Vol.1, pp. 309 and Vol. 2, pp.179.
• F.A. Hayek insists in this in The Legal and Political Philosophy of David Hume, Vol. III from Collected Works of F.A. Hayek, The University of Chicago, 1991, pp. 101-118
• Two books that can be read from Volumes 2 and 4 of the aforementioned work cited in note 101, David Hume, The Philosophical Works.
• David Parker insists in this respect in Philosophy and Ideology in Hume's Political Thought, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1981, p.2
• Of the Origin of Government Vol. 3, p.113.
• André-Louis Leroy, David Hume, Presses Universitaires de France, París, 1953, ch. XVI, reprinted by Arno Press, new York, 1979, pp. 225-240.
• Treatise of Human Nature: Of the rules which determine property ch.III, part II, Book III, Vol. II, pp. 273.
• José Martinez de Pisón, Justicia y Orden Político en Hume, CEC, Madrid, 1992, pp. 280-295.
• Of the Origin of Government, Vol. 3, p.113.
• Ernest Baker in The Theory of the Social Contract in Locke, Rousseau and Hume in Essays on Government, OUP, 1965, pp. 86-119.
• Of the Original Contract, Vol. 3, pp. 447 & 450
• Of the Original Contract, Vol. 3, pp. 447 & 450
• Of the Original Contract, Vol. 3, p. 455.
• Of the Original Contract, Vol. 2, pp. 300-304 and Of The First principles of Government Vol. 3, pp. 109-117.
• A Treatise of Human Nature, Vol. 2, p.328.
• Frederick G. Whelan, Time, revolution and prescriptive Right in Hume's Theory of Government, Utilitas, Vol. 7, no. 1, May 1995, pp. 98-107.
• A Treatise of Human Nature, Vol. 2, Book III, part II, ch. X, p. 325
• Of Passive Obedience, Vol. 3, pp. 462-3.
• In this respect see my previously cited article, Estado y Monopolio en Hume, pp. 80-90.
• On the Independence of Parliament, Vol. 3, p.120.
• Of Civil Liberty, Vol. 3, p.161
• Of the Rise and Progress of the Arts and Sciences, vol. 3, p.185.
• On the Independence of Parliament, Vol. 3, p.116.
• Of the Origin of Government, Vol. 2, p. 300.
• Legal Theory in 18th Century Britain, CUP, 1989, pp. 31-2.
• William Holdsworth, Some Makers of English Law, CUP, 1938, pp. 238 and 266.
• Commentaries, Introduction, II., p.67. Equally, pp.64 and 68.
• F.T.H. Fletcher, Montesquieu and English Politics (1750-1800), 1939, re-edited by Edward Arnold & Co., London, undated, pp. 107-151.
• Stanley Katz Introduction to the First Book of William Blacktone's Commentaries on the Laws of England . A Facsimile of the first edition of 1765-1769, The University of Chicago Press, Vol. 1, pp. X-XI.
• John V. Jezierski, Parliament or People: James Wilson and Blackstone on the nature and location of Sovereignty, in Journal of the History of Ideas, XXXII, 1971, pp. 96-106.
• The seven initial chapters of the first book of his 'Commentaries', especially pp. 142-144, 160-168 and 252.
• Sir Ernest Barker, Blackstone on the British Constitution, in Essays on Government, OUP, 2nd ed., 1965, p. 129
• Manuel Garcia Pelayo, Derecho Constitucional Comparado, Alianza Universidad, Madrid, 1984, pp. 249-250.
• Introducción al Derecho Inglés y NorteAmericano [Introduction to English and North-American Law] Ariel, Barcelona, 1998
• Lord Chancellor through equitable remedies, freely applying principles of conscience". P. 14, note 2. See also pp. 15-17.
• The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy, William Paley, M.A. Archdeacon of Carlisle, London, printed for R. Faulder, New Bond Street, MDCCLXXXV.
• A biography and a recompilation of the works of W. Paley in The Works of William Paley 1/4 with a life by Alexander Chalmers, 1819, 5 Volumes. New edition of Edmund Paley, 1830, 6 Volumes
• Martin Lowther Clarke. Paley: evidencia para el hombre, 1974. Con respecto a Paley, véase también L. Stephen, op. cit. vol. 1, págs. 407 y col., y vol. 2, págs. 124 y col.
• J. H. Burns y HL Hart, The Athlone Press, 1975.
• J.H. Burns, Bentham and Blackstone: A Lifetime's Dialectic, in Utilitas, OUP, Vol. 1 no. 1, may 1989, p22
• Ian Doolittle, Jeremy Bentham and Blackstone's Lectures, in "The Bentham Newsletter" no. 6, May, 1982, p. 23.
• A Fragment on Government, CUP, 1988, with an Introduction by Ross Harrison, Preface, para. 13.
• J.H. Burns, The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, edited by Paul Langford, OUP, 1981, Vol. III.
• The Bristol Address can be found in The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, edited by Paul Langford, OUP, 1981 Vol. III.
• A Fragment on Government ch. IV, para. 32, as highlighted by Bentham.
• [Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents, in The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, op. cit. Vol. II, pp. 241-323.
• Michel Ganzin, La Pensée Politique de Edmund Burke, Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudencia, París, 1972, cap. II, págs. 47-72.
• J. Brewer, Party Ideology and Popular Politics at the Accession of George III, CUP, 1976, pp. 39-138.
• Sophismes Anarchiques. Examen Critique de Diverses Déclataions de Droits de l'Homme et du Citoyen, in Jeremy Bentham's 'Ouvres en 4 Tomes', translated (into French) by P.E.L. Dumont & B. Laroche. Reprinted from the 1829 edition, Bruxelles, Scientia Verlag Aalen, 1969, t. 1, pp. 546-576.
• El libro de las falacias: de inacabado papeles de Jeremy Bentham, por un amigo. Peregrine Bingham, Hunt, Londres, 1824.
• [Leslie Stephen, History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century (1902), Thoemmes Antiquarian Books, Bristol, 1991, II, p. 260.
• Gregory Clacy's Thomas Paine, Social and Political Thought, Unwin Hyman, Boston, 1989;
• Breve estudio de Mark Philip, Paine, OUP, 1989.
• Thomas Paine, Political Writings, CUP, 1989, edited and introduced by Bruce Kuklic, pp. 1-38.
• Rights of Man, ed. cit. p. 143.
• Sophismes Anarchiques 1/4, ed. cit. Vol. I, pp. 556-7.
• [Federico Rosen, El origen del utilitarismo liberal: Jeremy Bentham y la libertad, en Victorian Liberalism, Nineteenth Century Political Thought and Practice, Routledge, Londres y Nueva York, 1990, págs. 63-4
• Benigno Pendas García, J. Bentham,: Política y Derecho en los Orígenes del Estado Constitucional, CEC, Madrid, 1988, pp. 281-288.
• J.R. Dindwiddy, "Bentham's Transition to Political Radicalism, 1809-1810" en Journal of the History of Ideas, no. XXXVI, pp. 683-700;
• J.H. Burns, Jeremy Bentham: De la Ilustración radical al Radicalismo filosófico, en The Bentham Boletín, n. 8, junio de 1984, págs. 4-13
• Lea Campos Boralevi, Un Riformatore tra due Rivoluzione: Jeremy Bentham, en Modelli nella storia del pensiero politico, Saggi a cura di V.I. Comparato, Leo S. Olschki, 1989, vol. II, págs. 117-142.
• Frederick Rosen, Jeremy Bentham y Democracia representativa. Un Estudio del Código Constitucional, Oxford, 1983, passim
• Benigno Pendás García, J. Bentham: Política y Derecho en los orígenes del Estado Constitucional;
• Josep Maria Colomer, Teoria de la Democracia en el Utilitarismo (en torno al pensamiento político de Bentham), REP, no. 57, 1987.
• Editorial Introduction to Vol. 1 to Constitutional Code, edited by F. Rosen and J.H. Burns in The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, OUP, 1991, pp. XI-XLV.
• Principles of Legislation (1802), in Plan of Parliamentary Reform (written in 1809 but published in 1817) and in Radicalism not dangerous (1820).
• Burt Franklin, New York, 3, Volumes, with a beautiful Preface to the second edition (1861), p.1-36 by his wife, Sara Austin.
• The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, ed. cit, Vol. 1, pp. 249-251, see in general,, pp. 248-253.
• Joseph Hamburger, Trouble Lifes: John & Sarah Austin, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1985. See also, A.D.E.Lewis, John Austin (1790-1859), Pupil of Bentham, in "The Bentham Newsletter", march, 1979, no. 2, pp. 18-29.
• Gustav Radbruch, Der Geist des englischen Rechts, 1958; Italian translation, Lo Spiritto del Diritto Inglese, Giuffré, Milan, 1962, pp. 49-50.
• Joaquín Varela Suanzes, La Monarquia en la teoría constitucional britanica durante el primer tercio del siglo XIX, in "Revista de Estudios Politicos", no. 96, April-June 1997, pp. 9-41
• Esudio Preliminar a los Dogmas de la Constitución, John James Park, Akal-Itsmo, Madrid, 1999 (impresión).
• Wilfrid E. Rumble, Nineteenth-Century Perceptions of John Austin: Utilitarianism and the Reviews of the Province of Jurisprudence Determined, in A Journal of Utilitarian Studies, Vol. 3, no 2, November, 1991, pp. 199-216.
• Wilfrin E. Rumble, Austin in the Classroom: Why were his Courses on Jurisprudence Unpopular?, in The Journal of Legal History, Vol. 17, April 1996, no. 1, pp. 17-40.
• Autobiografía, Alianza Editorial, Madrid, 1986, pp. 83 and 91-93.
• MacMillan, London, 1959, with an Introduction by E.C.S. Wade, pp. XIX to CXCVIII.
• E.C.S. Wade and A.W. Bradeley, Constitutional and Administrative Law, Longman, 11th edition, London, 1993, p. 69. Walter Bagehot, The English Constitution (1867). From the edition by Fontana Press with an Introduction by Richard Crossman, London, 1993
• The Cabinet System, CUP, 3rd edición, 1961, pág. 353; J H. Hanham, La Constitución del siglo XIX, 1815-1914
• Documentos y Comentarios, CUP, 1969, p. 24
• David Lindsay Keir, The Constitutional History of Great Britain Since 1485, Adams and Charles Black, 9th edition, London, 1965, p. 493.
• The Law and the Constitution, University of London Press, 5ª edición, 1959, págs. 149.
• The XIII and last of the Second Part, pp. 406-414.
• Joaquín Varela Suanzes, Constitución y Ley en los orígenes del Estado Liberal, in "Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional" no. 45, Sept-Dec, 1995, pp. 347-365.
• Sobre la rigidez constitucional, Alessandro Pace & Joaquín Varela, in La rigidez de las constituciones escritas, "Cuadernos y Debates", no. 58, CEC, Madrid, pp. 81-114.
• Introducción de E.C.S. Wade a la décima edición de Introducción a la Estudio de la Ley de la Constitución, MacMillan, Londres, 1959, pp. XIX a CXCVIII
• John F. Mceldowney, Dicey in Historical Perspective. Un ensayo de revisión, en Patrick Mcauslan y John Mceddowney, Legitimidad de la ley y la Constitución.
• Julio Stapleton, Dicey y su legado, en "Historia del pensamiento político", vol. XVI, n. 2, verano de 1995, págs. 234-256.
• Sir Ivor Jennings, The Law and the Constitution, University of London Press, 5th edition, 1959, p.144.
• H.L. Hart, The Concept of Law, OUP, 2nd edition, 1994, pp. 149-150.
• Geoffrey Marshall, Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Commonwealth, OUP, 1957, pág. 1
• Parliament of the United Kingdom. Constitutional and Administrative Law, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 7th edition, 1987, p.25..
• Colin R. Mumro, Studies in Constitutional Law, Butterworths, London, 1987, p. 82.
• Nevertheless this writer moves away from the doctrine of sovereignty argued by Dicey, pp. 83-108.
• Geoffrey Marshall in Constitutional Theory, OUP, 1980, p.43.
• Sidney Kentridge, Parliamentary Supremacy and the Judiciary under a Bill of Rights: some lessons from the Commonwealth, in "Public Law", Spring, 1997, pp. 96-112.
• Lawrence Collins, European Community Law in the United Kingdom, Manuales británicos de Derecho Constitucional y Administrativo, como, por ejemplo, el de O. Hood Phillips, Sweet & Maxwell, 7ª edición, Londres, 1987, págs. 71-82
• ECS Wade y A. W. bradley, Longman, Londres y Nueva York, 11ª edición, 1993, págs. 90-98
• H.W.R. Wade, soberanía: ¿Revolución o evolución?, en "The Law Quarterly Review" vol. 112, octubre de 1996, Londres, págs. 568-575
• John Eekelaar, La muerte de la soberanía parlamentaria. Un comentario, en "La ley Quarterly Review", Vol. 113, abril de 1997, Londres, págs. 185-187.
• Scotland's Parliament. Fundamentals for a new Scotland Act, in "The Constitutional Unit", Faculty of Law, University College, London, 1997.
• Stephen Sedley, The Sound of Silence: Constitutional Law without a Constitution, in "The Law Quarterly Review", Vol. 110, April 1994, London, pp. 270-291;
• Colin Turpin, British Government and the Constitution, Butterworths, 3rd edition, London, 1995, pp. 20-36;
• Geoffrey Marshall, Parliamentary Sovereignty: the new horizons, in "Public Law", Spring, 1997, pp. 1-5.